Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cthulhucachoo's avatar

What's actually morally bankrupt and devious is not acknowledging that the IRR purposefully lets people believe their list of laws are anti-white. Social media will produce thousands of comments (including from members of Parliament and massive accounts) describing the laws as racist - often in direct conversations with the IRR. You might want to ask yourself why they NEVER bother to correct anyone on this assumption. If you're struggling to get there, I'll help: it's because the IRR are race grifters who want to rile people up with a lie, knowing their audience is too daft to ch

check the list themselves.

Expand full comment
Me's avatar
Feb 27Edited

You have a comprehension problem. The IRR says:

Methodology:

"In other words, ‘race law’ is defined as any positive law, including statutes, regulations, and judgments of the courts, that makes or recognises race, skin-colour, or ethnicity as legally relevant."

They are not saying that the discrimination is against whites. They are saying the laws have an element of race in them, when the spirit of the SA constitution is that race may never again be used to discriminate against people, which is precisely what these laws are doing. Arguing otherwise is morally bankrupt and devious.

Expand full comment

No posts